Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: qualitative governing (varying the fuel quantity without throttling the air)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
When comparing part-load behavior of compression-ignition (CI) and spark-ignition (SI) engines, CI engines usually retain better efficiency at reduced loads. The key reason is how load is controlled. This question tests understanding of governing methods and their impact on pumping losses and thermal efficiency.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
CI engines operate unthrottled; fresh air is admitted freely and load is regulated by the injected fuel quantity. This is called qualitative governing. Since intake is not throttled, manifold pressure remains high and pumping work is small, so part-load efficiency remains relatively better. In contrast, SI engines often throttle the intake (quantitative governing), which raises pumping losses and reduces indicated efficiency at small loads.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify governing in CI: fuel-quantity control at nearly full air flow (no throttle).Relate governing to pumping work: unthrottled intake → low pumping losses.Connect to efficiency trend: smaller losses → less deterioration of efficiency as load drops.Therefore, the observed advantage at light loads is due to qualitative governing.
Verification / Alternative check:
Brake specific fuel consumption maps and pumping-loop p-V diagrams show that CI engines avoid the large negative pumping loop area typical of throttled SI engines at light loads.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming CI engines “increase” absolute efficiency at light load. In practice, efficiency still drops, but much less than in throttled SI engines due to the absence of throttling losses.
Final Answer:
qualitative governing (varying the fuel quantity without throttling the air)
Discussion & Comments