JDBC Type 2 drivers: do they connect through the native API of the target DBMS? Decide whether the statement is correct, and consider deployment implications.

Introduction / Context:
Knowing the differences among JDBC driver types helps diagnose classpath/native library issues and informs deployment strategies. Type 2 drivers are distinct because they rely on native client libraries provided by the DBMS vendor.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The claim: “Type 2 drivers connect to the native API of the DBMS.”
• We compare this to the canonical JDBC driver taxonomy.
• We consider cross-platform deployment constraints.

Concept / Approach:
Type 2 drivers are part Java and part native code; they call a DBMS’s native client API (for example, Oracle OCI). This requires installing the vendor’s client libraries on the host. In contrast, Type 4 drivers are pure Java and speak the database wire protocol directly. Thus, the statement about Type 2 is correct.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Attempt to load a Type 2 driver without native libs results in UnsatisfiedLinkError; installing the vendor client resolves it.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Type 2 is not pure Java thin; ODBC is unrelated to Type 2; it is not restricted to a single vendor or embedded databases.

Common Pitfalls:
Packaging apps without required native libraries; confusing Type 2 with the deprecated Type 1 bridge.

Final Answer:
Valid (Type 2 uses a native DBMS API accessed from Java)