Workgroup sizing: does a typical workgroup usually comprise between 25 and 100 people, or is that range more characteristic of larger departmental groups?

Introduction / Context:
The term “workgroup” is used in systems planning to indicate a small, collaborative team that shares data and processes. This question tests whether a size of 25–100 people is typical for a workgroup, or whether that range is more aligned with departmental units.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Workgroups are commonly small teams that collaborate closely on shared tasks.
• Departments or divisions usually include multiple workgroups and have broader scope.
• Tooling and data needs scale with group size—access control, coordination, and governance become heavier at larger sizes.

Concept / Approach:
In information systems analysis, a workgroup often falls in the single-digit to low double-digit range (for example, 5–20 people). This small size facilitates rapid communication, simpler permissions, and streamlined workflows. Counts in the 25–100 range typically describe larger departments or programs comprising several workgroups. Therefore, labeling 25–100 as “typical workgroup size” overstates the scale.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Review collaboration tools and licensing tiers that distinguish “team” versus “department” scale; typical team plans align with smaller numbers than 25–100.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Correct: Mischaracterizes workgroup scale.
• Enterprise size or project type does not redefine the common meaning of a small workgroup.
• “Cannot be generalized” is too vague; industry practice supports smaller sizes.

Common Pitfalls:
Equating headcount with collaboration effectiveness; ignoring that larger groups often subdivide into squads/workgroups.

Final Answer:
Incorrect