Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Contour line
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
In civil and agricultural engineering, the alignment of irrigation canals is crucial for efficient delivery of water to fields. Canals are usually designed so that water flows under gravity without the need for excessive pumping. This question tests your understanding of basic principles of canal alignment with respect to topography, especially contour lines and other landscape features.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
A contour line on a map connects points of equal elevation. If a canal closely follows a contour, its bed can be given a slight and uniform slope, just enough for water to flow without causing erosion. This makes contour alignment ideal for irrigation canals. Ridge lines and valley lines serve other purposes, and a purely straight line alignment may cut across varying slopes and elevations, making gravity flow difficult or wasteful. Therefore, canals are typically aligned approximately along contour lines, with slight falls for flow.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that irrigation canals are normally designed so that water flows under gravity without using pumps over long distances.
Step 2: Understand that this requires a nearly uniform and mild gradient, neither too steep (which would cause erosion) nor too flat (which would slow the flow excessively).
Step 3: Recognise that contour lines on a map represent equal elevation, so following a contour allows engineers to maintain nearly constant elevation and control the slope precisely.
Step 4: Consider that a random straight line alignment may cross hills and depressions, making it unsuitable for a controlled gravity flow canal.
Step 5: Note that ridge lines and valley lines are more relevant to drainage patterns and watersheds and are not typically used to align main irrigation canals.
Step 6: Conclude that aligning canals along contour lines is the correct choice.
Verification / Alternative Check:
Engineering textbooks and irrigation design manuals routinely describe canals as being laid out approximately along contours. This is particularly common in contour canals on slopes, where the canal skirts the hillside while maintaining a gentle gradient. If you imagine looking at a topographic map, you can see how a canal tracing one contour, with slight engineered deviations, would be efficient for gravity irrigation. This practical and theoretical consistency confirms that contour line alignment is correct.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
A straight line regardless of slope would often cut across rising and falling ground, requiring heavy excavation, siphons, or pumping, which is not economical for irrigation canals.
A ridge line is more suitable for locating watershed boundaries and drainage divides, not for carrying irrigation water along farmland slopes.
A valley line is typically used for locating natural drainage courses, where water flows downward, and is more suitable for rivers or drains rather than controlled canal alignments.
A river thalweg line represents the deepest channel of a river and is not a guideline for building artificial irrigation canals across agricultural land.
Common Pitfalls:
Some students think that a straight line is always best because it looks shortest on a map, forgetting that terrain elevation is critical for water flow. Others confuse the role of ridge lines and valleys, believing that canals should always follow natural drainage paths. In reality, designers compromise between distance and elevation control, which is why contour based alignments are preferred. Remembering the purpose of each type of line on a map helps avoid such mistakes.
Final Answer:
Irrigation canals are generally aligned along a Contour line so that water can flow by gravity with a gentle and controlled slope.
Discussion & Comments