Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: equals 0 V
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Induced voltages require change—either motion relative to a magnetic field or a time-varying magnetic field. This question probes the special case where both the conductor and the magnetic field are stationary.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Faraday’s law indicates induced emf is related to the time rate of change of magnetic flux linkage. Motional emf requires nonzero velocity v across B (e = B * l * v). Transformer emf requires time-varying flux (e ∝ dΦ/dt). With both v = 0 and dΦ/dt = 0, there is no mechanism to produce an induced voltage, so the induced voltage is zero.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Check for motional induction: v = 0 → e_motional = B * l * v = 0.2) Check for transformer induction: dΦ/dt = 0 → e_transformer = dΦ/dt = 0.3) Sum of induced effects = 0.4) Therefore, the induced voltage is 0 V.Verification / Alternative check:An experiment with a stationary wire and a permanent magnet at rest shows no measurable emf; moving either the wire or the magnet produces a measurable voltage, confirming the need for change.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:“Usually very large”: contradicts the requirement for motion or time variation.
“Varies with time”: no time variation exists in this setup.
“Depends on field strength”: field strength alone without motion or change does not induce a voltage across a stationary conductor.
Common Pitfalls:Assuming a strong static magnet automatically induces emf; confusing static magnetic force effects with induction requirements.
Final Answer:equals 0 V
Discussion & Comments