Workability Classification – slump value of 60 mm If the measured slump of a concrete mix is 60 mm using the standard cone, how would you classify its workability for normal (non-flowing) concrete?
-
AVery low
-
BLow
-
CMedium
-
DHigh
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: Medium
Explanation
Introduction / Context:The slump test provides a quick field indicator of workability/consistency of fresh concrete. Interpreting a given slump value in terms of practical placement categories helps select mixes for slabs, beams, heavily reinforced members, and pumped or vibrated placements.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Standard Abrams slump cone and test procedure.
- Conventional, non-self-compacting concrete.
- No special chemical admixtures altering slump retention beyond normal expectations.
Concept / Approach:
Typical ranges used on site are: very low (0–25 mm) for road pavements/roller-compacted types, low (25–50 mm) for lightly reinforced sections with vibration, medium (50–100 mm) for general RCC work, and high (>100 mm) for heavily congested reinforcement or pump mixes (with care to avoid segregation). At 60 mm, the mix sits comfortably in the medium workability band.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify slump value: 60 mm.Map to practical bands: 50–100 mm → medium workability.Select corresponding classification: “Medium”.Verification / Alternative check:
Project specifications frequently call for 50–100 mm slump for general beams and slabs with internal vibration, aligning with this classification.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Very low/low are too stiff; high implies risk of segregation without admixtures; “None” is inapplicable because “Medium” matches well-established ranges.
Common Pitfalls:
Using slump as a proxy for strength; adding water to “fix” low slump rather than using admixtures; ignoring temperature and aggregate moisture effects on slump.
Final Answer:
Medium