Highway design workflow: Before starting highway construction, engineers must plan both horizontal alignment (plan view) and vertical alignment (profile/grades). Is this standard practice?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Correct

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Highway projects require careful alignment design to ensure safety, capacity, drainage, earthwork balance, and cost control. Alignments are fundamental inputs for right-of-way, structures, and construction staking.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Horizontal alignment specifies tangents and curves in plan.
  • Vertical alignment defines grades and vertical curves in profile.
  • Design must meet standards for sight distance, superelevation, and drainage.


Concept / Approach:
The standard road design process develops a coordinated pair of alignments. The horizontal plan affects curvature and superelevation, while the vertical profile affects grades, crest/sag curves, and earthwork. Iterative design ensures both alignments satisfy criteria simultaneously.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Lay preliminary horizontal route optimizing terrain, land use, and constraints.Create a vertical profile meeting grade limits and sight-distance requirements.Iterate to balance cut/fill and coordinate drainage and structures.Finalize for staking, cross-sections, and construction documents.


Verification / Alternative check:
Check a typical plan set: you will find plan and profile sheets, cross-sections, and alignment tables confirming both alignments are always planned.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Incorrect / Only one alignment is planned: Neglecting either alignment violates standard practice and design codes.


Common Pitfalls:
Designing horizontal curves without matching vertical sight distances; ignoring drainage implications of long sags or crests; failing to iterate earthwork balance.


Final Answer:
Correct

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion