Highway design workflow: Before starting highway construction, engineers must plan both horizontal alignment (plan view) and vertical alignment (profile/grades). Is this standard practice?
-
ACorrect
-
BIncorrect
-
COnly the horizontal is planned
-
DOnly the vertical is planned
Answer
Correct Answer: Correct
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Highway projects require careful alignment design to ensure safety, capacity, drainage, earthwork balance, and cost control. Alignments are fundamental inputs for right-of-way, structures, and construction staking.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Horizontal alignment specifies tangents and curves in plan.
- Vertical alignment defines grades and vertical curves in profile.
- Design must meet standards for sight distance, superelevation, and drainage.
Concept / Approach:The standard road design process develops a coordinated pair of alignments. The horizontal plan affects curvature and superelevation, while the vertical profile affects grades, crest/sag curves, and earthwork. Iterative design ensures both alignments satisfy criteria simultaneously.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Lay preliminary horizontal route optimizing terrain, land use, and constraints.Create a vertical profile meeting grade limits and sight-distance requirements.Iterate to balance cut/fill and coordinate drainage and structures.Finalize for staking, cross-sections, and construction documents.Verification / Alternative check:Check a typical plan set: you will find plan and profile sheets, cross-sections, and alignment tables confirming both alignments are always planned.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Incorrect / Only one alignment is planned: Neglecting either alignment violates standard practice and design codes.Common Pitfalls:Designing horizontal curves without matching vertical sight distances; ignoring drainage implications of long sags or crests; failing to iterate earthwork balance.
Final Answer:Correct