Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: All of the above (flow rates, packing type/size, and concentrations)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
HETP translates packed-column performance into an equivalent number of ideal stages. Designers use HETP to size column height once the number of theoretical plates is determined from equilibrium calculations (McCabe–Thiele or rigorous VLE mass transfer models).
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
HETP is not a universal constant. It depends on packing geometry (random saddles, rings, structured packing), packing size (surface area and void fraction), flow rates (affecting film thickness, wetting, and flooding proximity), and mixture properties/compositions (affecting diffusivities, interfacial tension, and equilibrium slopes).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Vendor charts provide HETP ranges for the same packing at different liquid/gas loads and compositions, confirming multi-factor dependence.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Using catalog HETP without correcting for system properties; ignoring scale-up effects and maldistribution.
Final Answer:
All of the above (flow rates, packing type/size, and concentrations)
Discussion & Comments