Assertion–Reason (Jobs and Competition): Assertion (A): Rajeev has to work really hard to get a job after his graduation. Reason (R): There is a lot of competition for jobs.
-
ABoth (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
-
BBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
-
C(A) is true, but (R) is false.
-
D(A) is false, but (R) is true.
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
Explanation
Introduction / Context:The question explores labor-market reasoning: individual effort required to secure employment tends to increase with competition for limited openings.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- A: Rajeev must work very hard to obtain a job after graduation.
- R: Job markets are highly competitive.
- Assumed ceteris paribus: number of applicants per vacancy is high; employers screen rigorously.
Concept / Approach:Establish whether A and R are true in general situations and assess if R explains A. Competitive labor markets raise hiring thresholds, increasing the need for preparation, upskilling, and persistence.
Step-by-Step Solution:1) R is credible: Many sectors have many applicants per role.2) A follows: Under high competition, candidates must differentiate via skills, projects, internships, and interview readiness—hence “working hard.”3) Explanation sufficiency: High competition directly raises standards, explaining Rajeev’s need for greater effort.
Verification / Alternative check:Hiring funnels show steep attrition; strong portfolios, certifications, and practice can materially improve outcomes, aligning with the explanation.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:(b) denies causality though it exists; (c)/(d) misstate truths; “None” is unnecessary.
Common Pitfalls:Ignoring other factors (networking, location, macro cycles). These modulate but do not negate the core explanation based on competition.
Final Answer:Both A and R are true, and R correctly explains A.