Adder selection – should a half adder be used whenever a carry input is required in an adder stage?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Adders come in two basic building blocks: half adders and full adders. A half adder has no carry input; a full adder accepts a carry in (Cin). The choice depends on whether a stage must add two bits only or two bits plus an incoming carry.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Binary addition across multiple bit positions.
  • LSB stage has no incoming carry; higher stages typically do.
  • Goal: determine which block to use when Cin is required.


Concept / Approach:
A half adder computes Sum = A XOR B and Carry = A * B. A full adder computes Sum = A XOR B XOR Cin and Cout = (A * B) + (Cin * (A XOR B)). Therefore, whenever a carry input is required, a full adder—not a half adder—must be used.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Identify stage type: if Cin exists, half adder is insufficient.2) Replace with full adder to include the Cin term in Sum and Cout.3) Chain full adders across all but the least significant stage in ripple-carry designs.4) Conclusion: the claim is incorrect; use full adders when a carry input is required.


Verification / Alternative check:
Standard ripple-carry adders: LSB stage can be a half adder; all higher stages are full adders to accept carry propagation.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:
It is not limited to LSB, ripple mode, or delay issues; the functional requirement (Cin) dictates using a full adder.


Common Pitfalls:
Trying to feed an external carry into a half adder by ad hoc wiring; this breaks the defined logic equations.


Final Answer:
Incorrect

More Questions from Digital Arithmetic Operations and Circuits

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion