Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Aerospace
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
CAD/CAM reshaped many industries, but aerospace faced a unique combination of challenges: large assemblies, aerodynamic surfaces, stringent certification, and demanding supply chains. These factors favored early and deep investment in digital design and computer-integrated manufacturing to reduce lead times and ensure accuracy across complex parts and assemblies.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
CAD enables precise surface definition and parametric control; CAM drives CNC for machining titanium, aluminum, and composites; PLM links engineering changes to manufacturing. Aerospace leveraged these faster than many sectors because even small geometric deviations can compromise performance and safety, and because economies of scope (variants, customizations) are strong. Other industries adopted CAD/CAM too, but the cumulative, systemic change has been especially visible in aerospace.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Compare domains by need for complex geometry and traceability.Identify aerospace as high on both counts.Recognize early adoption history and deep integration with CNC/PLM.Select “Aerospace.”
Verification / Alternative check:
Case histories of airframe and engine manufacturers show pioneering CAD/CAM use (e.g., airfoil design, 5-axis machining, digital mock-ups), reinforcing aerospace as the leading adopter.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Medical: growing impact, but historically narrower scope and later adoption.Electronics: strong EDA adoption, but distinct from mechanical CAD/CAM focus.Cartography: uses GIS/CAD, yet manufacturing transformation is less dramatic.None of the above: incorrect, aerospace is well supported.
Common Pitfalls:
Equating electronic design automation with mechanical CAD/CAM; overlooking the different maturity curves across sectors.
Final Answer:
Aerospace
Discussion & Comments