Oscillation frequency on the Moon versus on the Earth: For identical small-oscillation systems (e.g., a simple pendulum), how does the frequency of oscillation on the Moon compare with that on the Earth?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 2.44 times less

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Natural frequency of many gravity-controlled oscillators (like a simple pendulum) depends on the local gravitational acceleration g. Comparing environments with different g values, such as Earth and Moon, illustrates how gravity influences timing devices and dynamic response.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • For a simple pendulum of length L, small-angle frequency f = (1 / 2π) * sqrt(g / L).
  • Approximate lunar gravity g_moon ≈ g_earth / 6.
  • Length L is unchanged; small-angle approximation applies.


Concept / Approach:

Frequency scales with the square root of gravity: f ∝ sqrt(g). Therefore, the ratio f_moon / f_earth = sqrt(g_moon / g_earth) ≈ sqrt(1/6) ≈ 0.408. Thus, the lunar frequency is about 0.41 times the terrestrial value, meaning it is roughly 2.44 times less (the period is 2.44 times longer).


Step-by-Step Solution:

Compute ratio: f_moon / f_earth = sqrt( (g/6) / g ) = sqrt(1/6).Evaluate: sqrt(1/6) ≈ 0.408.Hence frequency on Moon ≈ 0.41 of that on Earth → “2.44 times less”.


Verification / Alternative check:

Period scales inversely with frequency: T = 1/f. Therefore, T_moon / T_earth = 1 / 0.408 ≈ 2.45, matching the “2.44 times less” frequency statement.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

(a) and (d) suggest frequency increases on the Moon, which contradicts f ∝ sqrt(g); (c) “3 times less” is an overestimate; (e) ignores the large difference in g.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing frequency and period; using a linear instead of square-root dependence on g; rounding errors that change the qualitative conclusion.


Final Answer:

2.44 times less

More Questions from Applied Mechanics

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion