Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Both (a) and (b)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Nuclear reactors rely on neutron economy to maintain a self-sustaining chain reaction. Two powerful levers are fuel enrichment (increasing the fissile isotope U-235 fraction) and moderation (slowing down neutrons), both of which raise the probability that a neutron will induce fission rather than be absorbed or leak from the core.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Criticality requires that the average number of neutrons from each fission that cause another fission equals one. Increasing U-235 content raises the macroscopic fission cross-section. Moderation slows down neutrons to thermal energies where the U-235 fission cross-section is much higher, greatly improving the likelihood of fission and reducing the required enrichment.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Recognize that U-235 is the primary fissile isotope in low-enriched uranium.Slower (thermal) neutrons have a larger probability of inducing U-235 fission.Therefore, enrichment (a) and moderation (b) both move the system toward k-effective = 1.Combining both is the standard approach in most power reactors.
Verification / Alternative check:
Pressurized and boiling water reactors use light-water moderation with low-enriched uranium; heavy-water reactors use stronger moderation allowing natural uranium; both exemplify how (a) and/or (b) achieve criticality.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Choosing only one factor ignores the complementary role of the other. “None of these” contradicts reactor design practice.
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing moderators with coolants or assuming enrichment alone is sufficient without considering leakage and absorption in structural materials.
Final Answer:
Both (a) and (b)
Discussion & Comments