Best device for removing very fine particulates from power station flue gas In large thermal power plants, which equipment is preferred for high-efficiency removal of fine fly ash from flue gases?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Electrostatic precipitators

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Controlling particulate emissions from coal-fired and similar thermal power stations is crucial for air quality compliance. Flue gas contains a broad particle size distribution, with significant fractions in the fine (sub-micron to a few microns) range, often called fly ash. The question focuses on the most common, highly efficient industrial choice for large-scale fine particulate control.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Large, continuous-duty thermal power station service.
  • Target: very fine particulates (fly ash) at high flow rates and temperatures.
  • Need: proven, high-collection efficiency with acceptable pressure drop and operability.


Concept / Approach:
Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) charge particles using corona discharge and then collect them on oppositely charged plates. ESPs can achieve very high collection efficiencies (often exceeding 99%) for a wide size range, with relatively low pressure drop—making them a mainstay in power generation. While fabric filters (baghouses) can also achieve excellent fine-particle removal, ESPs have historically been the default in many large units due to thermal tolerance, capacity, and low pressure losses.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify required performance: very high efficiency on fine fly ash at large gas volumes.Match technology: ESPs provide high efficiency with low pressure drop.Confirm common industry practice: ESPs are widely installed on utility boilers.Select “Electrostatic precipitators.”


Verification / Alternative check:
Regulatory performance reports and plant configurations around the world corroborate ESP use for fine ash control in large boilers.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Wet scrubber: Effective for soluble gases and coarser dust; fine particle capture can be lower without specialized designs.Bag filter: Very efficient but historically less common on very large, high-temperature utility boilers (though increasingly used); the canonical answer for big power stations is ESP.Dust catcher: A simple inertial device, not suitable for fine particles at utility scale.


Common Pitfalls:
Equating all “filters” with best fine capture regardless of scale; process constraints and pressure drop matter in utility service.



Final Answer:
Electrostatic precipitators

More Questions from Environmental Engineering

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion