Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Correct
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Transformers, inductors, and magnetic shields exploit high-permeability materials to guide magnetic flux. The statement claims that iron can change the course (path) of magnetic lines of force, which reflects practical magnetic circuit design.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Magnetic flux prefers paths of least reluctance, analogous to current choosing paths of least resistance. Since ferromagnetic materials have high permeability, their reluctance is low, attracting and guiding flux. C-cores, E-cores, and closed magnetic paths in transformers exemplify this principle by confining and redirecting field lines to improve coupling and reduce leakage.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Compare permeabilities: mu_iron » mu_air implies lower reluctance in iron.2) Flux lines crowd into the iron, following the high-permeability path.3) The presence and shape of the iron core redirect the flux lines.4) Therefore, iron changes the course of magnetic lines of force.Verification / Alternative check:Field plots (finite-element simulations) and simple iron filings experiments show flux concentration near iron pieces and redirection along cores and shields.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:Incorrect: ignores basic magnetic circuit behavior.
Requires permanent magnetization or cryogenic temperatures: flux guidance is due to permeability, not necessarily due to remanent magnetization or extreme temperatures.
Common Pitfalls:Equating “lines of force” with physical strings; they are visualizations of field direction and density. Forgetting saturation, which limits flux guidance when B approaches material limits.
Final Answer:Correct
Discussion & Comments