In the following sentence about parliamentary procedure, identify which part contains a grammatical error: Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, (1) and upon being passed, are sent to the Rajya Sabha, (2) where it can be deliberated upon for upto 14 days. (3) No error (4).

Introduction / Context:
This question deals with language used to describe the procedure for money bills in the Indian Parliament. While the content is factual, the exam focuses on correct English usage, spelling, and word spacing. The sentence is split into numbered parts, and you must identify which part contains a grammatical or lexical error, or conclude that there is no error. Here, special attention is needed for the expression that refers to the time period for deliberation.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Part (1): Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha,
• Part (2): and upon being passed, are sent to the Rajya Sabha,
• Part (3): where it can be deliberated upon for upto 14 days.
• Part (4): No error.
• The phrase "upto" appears in part (3).
• Standard written English separates "up to" into two words.

Concept / Approach:
In formal English, the correct spelling is "up to" as two separate words, not "upto" as a single word. Official documents and standard grammar references treat "up to" as a prepositional phrase indicating a limit of quantity, time, or degree. Thus, "for up to 14 days" is correct, whereas "for upto 14 days" is incorrect. The rest of the sentence uses present simple passive forms appropriately to describe a general constitutional procedure, and its structure is acceptable for exam purposes.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Read part (1): "Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha," which correctly describes where such bills originate. Step 2: Read part (2): "and upon being passed, are sent to the Rajya Sabha," which is grammatically acceptable and logically follows from part (1). Step 3: Read part (3): "where it can be deliberated upon for upto 14 days." The problematic phrase is "for upto 14 days". Step 4: Recall that the accepted spelling in standard English is "up to", two words, not one. Step 5: Recognise that the sentence should read "for up to 14 days" to be correct. Step 6: Verify that there are no other grammatical errors in part (3); the rest of the clause is acceptable in exam style. Step 7: Conclude that the error lies in part (3).

Verification / Alternative check:
Consider the corrected sentence: "Money bills can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, and upon being passed, are sent to the Rajya Sabha, where it can be deliberated upon for up to 14 days." This version now uses standard English spelling. The phrase "for up to 14 days" is commonly found in legal, academic, and journalistic writing. The present simple "can only be introduced" and "are sent" correctly describe ongoing constitutional rules, so they do not require change. This confirms that the only clear error is the spelling of "up to" in part (3).

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Part (1) correctly expresses the rule that money bills can only originate in the Lok Sabha. Part (2) correctly describes their being sent to the Rajya Sabha after being passed. Although some might debate minor stylistic choices, there is no clear grammatical mistake in these segments. Part (4), "No error", is incorrect, because the spelling error in part (3) must be acknowledged. Therefore, none of the other parts should be marked as containing the error.

Common Pitfalls:
Many learners and even some informal writers incorrectly join "up to" into a single word "upto", especially in digital communication. Because of this habit, exam candidates may overlook the mistake when reading quickly. To avoid this error, remember that in standard written English, "up to" is always two separate words. Developing the habit of noticing such small spelling and spacing issues will help you score better on error spotting questions.

Final Answer:
The incorrect segment is Part (3), where "upto" should be written as "up to".