Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Metals
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This analogy question checks your ability to connect technical terms with the objects they commonly describe. The first pair Errata : Books reminds us that errata are lists of errors and corrections that are printed to accompany books or documents. In the second part, flaws : ? we must identify what type of thing usually has flaws in the same technical sense. Good analogy solving requires you to focus on the most natural, textbook style association rather than any loose everyday use of the word.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The relationship in the first pair is that Errata describes defects in Books. Errata are not a separate object; they are lists of mistakes and corrections connected with a printed work. For the second pair, we must look for the object that is most typically said to have flaws in a technical sense. In everyday language and in engineering, Metals are frequently described as having flaws, such as cracks, voids, or inclusions. These material flaws can weaken the metal and are often detected by inspection or testing. So the parallel idea is Flaws : Metals, just as Errata : Books.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Interpret Errata as the record of mistakes in printed books or documents.
Step 2: Observe that Books are the main objects connected with Errata.
Step 3: Now focus on the word Flaws, which means structural defects or imperfections.
Step 4: Recall that technical contexts often mention flaws in metals, such as in steel beams, machine parts, or welded joints.
Step 5: Examine the options and see that Metals is the only answer that fits a standard, technical phrase like flaws in metals.
Step 6: Conclude that the best matching analogy is Errata : Books :: Flaws : Metals.
Verification / Alternative check:
We can test the other options by trying to place the word flaws before them. Flaws in speech is possible but usually expressed as flaws in argument or errors in speech; it does not have the same fixed feel as flaws in metals in science and engineering textbooks. Manuscripts can contain errors, but we usually use words such as mistakes, typographical errors, or inconsistencies, not flaws in manuscripts as a technical expression. Charter is a formal document and might have legal defects, yet again the regular phrase is errors in a charter rather than flaws in a charter. Metals, on the other hand, are regularly checked for flaws using testing techniques like X ray inspection or ultrasonic testing. This consistent usage confirms Metals as the best choice.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Speech: Although speech can have weaknesses or errors, the normal expression is faulty speech or incorrect speech, not a fixed pairing of flaws and speech comparable to flaws and metals.
Manuscripts: Manuscripts can be full of mistakes, but as with books, the common term is errors or corrections rather than flaws as a material term.
Charter: A charter is a legal or formal document. Problems with a charter are often called invalid provisions or legal defects, not usually flaws in the same material sense used with metals.
Common Pitfalls:
A frequent error is to treat flaws as any kind of mistake and immediately associate it with speech or written documents. However, the question is looking for a parallel to the technical partnership between Errata and Books. When engineers talk about flaws, they often specifically mean material defects in metals or other solid materials. Recognising that there is a stronger, more specific association with metals helps you avoid loosely matching the word to any place where errors could exist. Successful analogy solving depends on spotting these more precise, textbook style connections.
Final Answer:
Errata are linked with errors in books, and in a similar technical sense flaws are linked with metals, so Metals is the correct answer.
Discussion & Comments