Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: True
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Constitutive relations link electric flux density D and electric field E. In many practical cases, a scalar permittivity ε = ε0 εr suffices, but anisotropic materials require a more general description to capture direction-dependent response.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In isotropic materials, permittivity is the same in all directions and D = ε0 εr E with εr a scalar. In anisotropic media, the proportionality is direction-dependent, and the correct form is D = ε̄ · E, where ε̄ is a second-rank tensor (matrix). Consequently, D need not be parallel to E in anisotropic materials, and components couple through off-diagonal terms in ε̄.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify isotropy → scalar ε suffices → D parallel to E.Identify anisotropy → tensor ε̄ needed → D = ε̄ · E, generally not collinear.Hence the statement is true as written.
Verification / Alternative check:
Electro-optic crystals (e.g., calcite) exhibit birefringence precisely because ε̄ is anisotropic; wave propagation depends on direction, confirming tensorial permittivity.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“False” disregards well-established anisotropy. “True only in vacuum” is incorrect; many isotropic materials satisfy the scalar relation. “D and E are always parallel” fails in anisotropic media. Frequency limitations are not the main distinction here; linearity and isotropy are.
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
True
Discussion & Comments