Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Both A and R are correct but R is not correct explanation of A
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Assertion–Reason questions test both conceptual correctness and causal linkage. In a half-wave controlled rectifier, continuous gating during the positive half-cycle can make the SCR conduct from near the start of that half-cycle until the natural current zero. The reason statement addresses a necessary condition for conduction (forward bias) but does not fully explain the sufficiency for full 180° conduction.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
With continuous gate drive, the SCR triggers as soon as forward bias appears (near ωt ≈ 0+), then remains on until the current naturally falls to zero at the end of the positive half-cycle. Thus, conduction spans approximately 180°. The reason statement is true—forward bias is required—but forward bias alone does not guarantee conduction without gate triggering (unless breakover occurs). Hence, R does not wholly explain why conduction lasts the entire half-cycle under continuous gating.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Classic half-wave control waveforms show full half-cycle conduction when firing angle α → 0°, achievable with continuous gating.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Claiming R explains A overlooks the role of gate triggering; stating A is wrong contradicts standard operation; saying R is wrong denies the forward-bias prerequisite.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming forward bias alone turns on an SCR; forgetting that without a gate pulse, the device may not conduct unless the voltage rises to breakover.
Final Answer:
Both A and R are correct but R is not correct explanation of A
Discussion & Comments