True or False: The RF impedance level of IMPATT diodes is generally lower than that of Gunn diodes.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: False

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Gunn and IMPATT diodes are common solid-state microwave sources but operate on different physical principles and present different device impedances to resonant circuits or transmission lines.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Typical Gunn diode impedances are relatively low (a few to a few tens of ohms).
  • Typical IMPATT diode impedances are higher (tens to hundreds of ohms), depending on design and frequency.


Concept / Approach:
Gunn diodes (transferred electron effect) are commonly matched using low-impedance resonant circuits, while IMPATT diodes (avalanche transit-time) exhibit higher negative resistance magnitude and effective impedance, thus often require different matching networks. Therefore, the statement that IMPATT has “lower” impedance than Gunn is incorrect.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Recall typical ranges: Z_Gunn ≈ few Ω to ~20 Ω; Z_IMPATT ≈ ~20 Ω to a few hundred Ω.Compare: Z_IMPATT > Z_Gunn in most practical designs.Hence the assertion “IMPATT impedance is generally lower than Gunn” is false.


Verification / Alternative check:
Device application notes and oscillator design examples routinely show low-Q, low-Z resonators for Gunns, whereas IMPATT oscillators use higher-Z matching networks or resonators.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

“True” variants contradict widely observed device characteristics.“Cannot be determined” ignores broad empirical ranges known to practitioners.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing the higher RF power capability of IMPATT in some bands with lower impedance; these are independent attributes.


Final Answer:

False

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion