For a 50 Ω resistor intended for use at 3 GHz, what should be the approximate maximum stray capacitance so that its reactance does not significantly disturb operation?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: 0.1 pF

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
At microwave frequencies, even tiny stray capacitances can produce reactances comparable to a 50 Ω system impedance, detuning networks and degrading matching. It is therefore useful to estimate an upper bound on allowable stray capacitance.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • System impedance around 50 Ω at f = 3 GHz.
  • Design goal: capacitive reactance magnitude |Xc| should be much larger than 50 Ω (e.g., ≥ 10 × 50 Ω) so it is negligible.
  • Use ideal capacitor model for a first estimate.


Concept / Approach:

Capacitive reactance is Xc = 1 / (2 * π * f * C). Choose a target |Xc|, solve for C. Taking |Xc| ≈ 500 Ω (ten times 50 Ω) is a reasonable engineering rule-of-thumb for negligible effect.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Target |Xc| = 500 Ω at f = 3 × 10^9 Hz.Compute C_max: C_max = 1 / (2 * π * f * |Xc|).C_max = 1 / (2 * π * 3e9 * 500) ≈ 1.06 × 10^-13 F.Convert to pF: ≈ 0.106 pF → about 0.1 pF.


Verification / Alternative check:

If C were 1 pF, |Xc| ≈ 1 / (2 * π * 3e9 * 1e-12) ≈ 53 Ω, which is already comparable to 50 Ω and thus unacceptable. Therefore 0.1 pF is a sensible upper limit.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • 1 μF, 1 nF, 10 pF, 1 pF: These yield reactances far too small in magnitude at 3 GHz, badly disturbing a 50 Ω environment.


Common Pitfalls:

Ignoring lead inductance (also important), using DC component values without considering parasitics, or assuming 1 pF is 'tiny'—at GHz it is not.



Final Answer:

0.1 pF

More Questions from Microwave Communication

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion