Analogy — Disobedience : Punishment\nChoose the pair that mirrors the cause–effect relation, where an action or quality naturally invites a corresponding consequence.

Introduction / Context:
In verbal analogies, we look for the underlying relation connecting the first pair and then select the option that preserves the same relation. The pair “Disobedience : Punishment” represents a cause–effect pattern. An instance of disobedience typically warrants a consequence in the form of punishment. Our task is to find another pair in which the first term characteristically leads to, merits, or brings about the second term.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The left term should be a behavior or quality.
• The right term should be the socially expected or conventional consequence.
• The relation should be normative and recognizable, not merely possible.

Concept / Approach:
We identify which option shows a widely accepted linkage from quality to consequence. We reject pairs that show no stable linkage, only a loose association, or mismatched categories. The closer the social convention behind the effect, the better the fit with the stimulus–response nature of the stem pair.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
In social and moral contexts, brave deeds regularly receive appreciation, awards, or praise. This mirrors the predictability of disobedience drawing punishment, preserving a symmetrical cause–effect design across positive and negative domains.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Prayer : Salvation — relies on faith tradition and conditions; not a general or guaranteed consequence.
• Patience : Listening — correlation is weak and nonconsequential; listening does not automatically follow patience.
• Teenager : Dynamic — attribute assignment, not consequence.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing mere association with a normative consequence; overlooking that the stem describes a widely expected response to a behavior.

Final Answer:
Bravery : Appreciation