Scope of superposition: The superposition theorem is applicable only to AC circuits, not DC circuits. True or false?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: False

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Superposition is a consequence of linearity, not of waveform type. Whether sources are DC, AC, or a mix, linear circuits allow responses from each independent source to be summed to obtain the total response.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The circuit is linear (resistors, linear dependent sources, and linear models of L and C).
  • Sources may be constant (DC) or time-varying (AC) at one or more frequencies.
  • Power is not superposed directly because it is nonlinear in voltage/current.


Concept / Approach:

To apply superposition, deactivate all but one independent source at a time: DC voltage sources become shorts, DC current sources become opens (same rules as for AC). Compute each partial response (voltages/currents) and add them algebraically. This works equally well in DC-only circuits, AC-only circuits, or mixed-signal cases.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify all independent sources (DC and AC).Deactivate the others and solve for the response due to the active one.Repeat for every source and sum the individual responses.If needed, handle different AC frequencies using phasors per frequency and then superpose in time domain.


Verification / Alternative check:

Compare with nodal analysis solutions including all sources simultaneously. The summed superposition result will match the full solution, demonstrating applicability beyond AC-only cases.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • “True” confuses superposition with phasor techniques; phasors are for steady-state sinusoidal AC, but superposition itself is a linear principle valid for DC and AC.


Common Pitfalls:

Trying to superpose powers or deactivating dependent sources (they remain active). Also, ensure the circuit models remain linear over the operating range.


Final Answer:

False

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion