Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: 15/16
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:Torsion design often favours hollow shafts because material is more effective away from the centre. This question compares the torsional strength (torque for a given maximum shear stress) of a solid versus a hollow circular shaft with the same outer diameter and material.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:For circular shafts, torsional strength T is related to polar section modulus Zp: T = τ_max * Zp. For a solid shaft, Zp_solid = (π/16) * D^3. For a hollow shaft, Zp_hollow = J/R = [(π/32) * (D^4 − d^4)] / (D/2).
Step-by-Step Solution:
Let d = D/2 → d^4 = (D/2)^4 = D^4 / 16.Compute J_hollow = (π/32) * (D^4 − D^4/16) = (π/32) * (15/16) * D^4.Compute Zp_hollow = J_hollow / (D/2) = (π/16) * (15/16) * D^3.Compute Zp_solid = (π/16) * D^3.Strength ratio = Zp_hollow / Zp_solid = 15/16.Verification / Alternative check:Because most torque resistance comes from outer fibres, removing the core barely reduces strength: 15/16 ≈ 0.9375, confirming high efficiency of hollow sections.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:1/16, 1/8, 1/4 drastically underestimate strength; they ignore the outer-radius dominance in torsion.
Common Pitfalls:Comparing polar moments J (stiffness-related) instead of polar modulus Zp (strength-related); forgetting to divide J by outer radius for strength.
Final Answer:
15/16
Discussion & Comments