Critical Reasoning — Conclusions Statement: Video libraries are flourishing these days. Which conclusion(s) follow?

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:We are told that video libraries are thriving. We must decide which inference is justified: (I) people have a 'video craze'; (II) watching many movies via video is much cheaper than visiting cinema halls. Only what is reasonably implied by flourishing demand can be concluded. Given Data / Assumptions: Observed outcome: video libraries are flourishing. Conclusion I: There is a widespread craze/strong preference among people for video content or renting videos. Conclusion II: Videos are much cheaper than cinema for multiple movies. Concept / Approach: Business flourishing generally indicates strong demand or consumer preference. Cost advantage may be one factor, but the statement does not specify price or a cost comparison to cinema halls. Step-by-Step Solution: Conclusion I: Increased popularity is a reasonable inference from flourishing businesses; I follows.Conclusion II: While possibly true in many contexts, it is not stated or entailed. Thriving could result from convenience, content variety, or availability, not necessarily price alone. II does not follow. Verification / Alternative check: Even if cinema prices fell, video libraries could still flourish due to home convenience; hence price inference is not mandatory. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any option accepting II over-reads the text. 'Neither' ignores a clear implication (popularity). Common Pitfalls: Assuming a single cause (cost) for success when multiple drivers could exist. Final Answer: Only conclusion I follows

Critical Reasoning — Conclusions Statement: Video libraries are flourishing these days. Which conclusion(s) follow?

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments