Introduction / Context:
The report explicitly mentions a 'milk glut' and that existing institutions failed to utilize the available milk, prompting government action. We must infer which conclusion is justified: (I) production exceeds need; (II) government/co-op dairies lack resources/technology to handle excess milk.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- There is a 'milk glut' in State X.
- Cooperatives and government dairies failed to use the available milk.
- Cabinet took steps to tackle the glut.
Concept / Approach:
- 'Glut' means supply significantly exceeds demand/absorption at prevailing conditions.
- But 'failure to use' could result from many reasons: logistics, procurement policy, price, storage limits, coordination, or technology issues. The specific cause is not stated.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Conclusion I: 'Milk production is more than need.' This aligns with the notion of glut. Hence I follows.Conclusion II: 'Not equipped in resources/technology.' This assigns a specific reason for failure. The statement does not attribute cause; thus II does not necessarily follow.
Verification / Alternative check:
Even if dairies were well equipped, policy pricing or transport could still cause non-utilization. Therefore II is not compelled by the text.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Options including II assume causation without evidence. 'Neither' is incorrect because I follows from 'glut.'
Common Pitfalls:
Equating 'failure to use' with a particular deficiency without textual support.
Final Answer:
Only conclusion I follows
Discussion & Comments