C + N ? C is the daughter of N
and N - J ? N is the brother of I.
Hence, I is niece of J.
Here II is irrelevant. Hence, II is not Implicit. But I must have been assumed by the politician; otherwise how can the status of industrial progress be related with unemployment?
Some cushions are trolleys + All trolleys are lamps = I + A = I = Some cushions are lamps Hence III follows. All chairs are tables + All tables are cushions = A + A = A = All chairs are cushions Hence IV follows All tables are cushions + Some cushions are trolleys = A + I = No conclusion Hence I does not follow. All chairs are cushions + Some cushions are trolleys = A + I = No conclusion Hence II does not follow.
First Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
Second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
All clerks are typists. ? Some typists are stenos.
A + I ?No Conclusion
Conclusions I and II form Complementary Pair. Therefore, either I or II follows.
The first Premise is Universal Affirmative (A-type).
The second Premise is Particular Affirmative (I-type).
Most players are men. ? Some man are singers.
A + I ? No Conclusion
Conclusion I is Converse of the second statement.
The given situation demands a prompt action as there may be some bomb or some other illegal things in the scooter which he has left there chasing the person on your own may be risky. So, the correct action in this situation is to inform the police at the nearby booth.
the pattern is ...abb
All numbers are prime numbers except 15.
83 is the only number which is prime, while others are composite numbers.
relationship is a : (a + 89)
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.