I cannot be concluded because of the presence of world "all" in it. II is the obvious choice from both the statements.
I does not make any connection with the given statement, but II does. Hence, I cannot be drawn but II can be.
fruits ? B-Complex ? good for health
Presence of word 'most' in the statement makes both I and II ambiguous. hence, none of I and II can be drawn.
Anand comes on a bicycle which is not used by any teacher. Hence, Anand cannot be a teacher. therefore, I is valid. II is not valid because if Anand is not a teacher, he is either a students or a staff member.
We are arrive at the conclusion by combining three pieces of information given in the three statements.
Neither conclusion I nor II is implicit in the statement. Any person can be philanthropist whether he is rich or poor.
I is invalid as export is not the subject of discussion in the given statement. II is a valid conclusion because there has been increase in production of two wheelers with improved qualities.
Neither of the conclusion follows from the given statement.
Most dresses are expensive means some are cheap also.
Option (c) is required to validate the conclusion stated in the given passage.
No reasons are specified in the question for going to different camps. As, Ankit has been going to different camps since the past two year, so it can be said that he goes to some type of camp every summer.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.