The second statement clearly corroborates the Conclusion II.
Neither Conclusions I nor II follows. Overpopulation is a result of several factors. Therefore, only unscientific thinking can not be held responsible for overpopulation.
From both the statements it is clear that Conclusion I is true.
If player is found guilty of doping, , his medal is confiscated. therefore, only Conclusion II follows.
Only Conclusion I follows.
This is a good book can be concluded.
Fom the statements it is clear that knowledge is interdiciplilnary. Thus, Conclusion I follows.
Both the conclusions are not related to the statement. hence, neither I nor II follows
A friends who offers help in the time of need is a true friend. The use of them 'all' in Conclusions I makes it invalid. Conclusion II does not express the inherent meaning of the statement. Therefore, neither Conclusion I nor II follows.
Only Conclusion I follows because funding along with other factors can improve quality of education but funding alone cannot guarantee the enhancement of quality of education.
Prostitution is not the only reason of AIDS. it is one of the main reason of this disease. Hence, banning only prostitution cannot work 100% to control this disease. it means other factor must be considered also.Therefore, II is a valid conclusion. Conclusion I is invalid as it has not been discussed in the statement that AIDS is curable or not.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.