Conclusion I and II both are follow because both are related to the statement given.
Only Conclusion II is wrong which isn't related to statement.
Only conclusion II follows because the nation will not be able to provide a decent living to its citizens cause of the increasing population of our nation.
Only Conclusion I follows because funding can improve quality of education along with other factors but funding alone cannot guarantee the enhancement of quality of education.
Here, only Conclusion ,II follows because this statement is a quote given by the Greek philosopher Socrates which implies that knowledge of world is too vast to be explored by a single person,
Clearly, companies other than 'X' may also have recognition in camera industry, So Conclusion I does not follows. Also Conclusion II does not follows as according to statement, ,the quality of camera, not of the cameraman. Hence, neither Conclusion I nor II follows.
Only conclusion, 'Parents have an obsessive passion for a perfect development of their children thought good schooling.
Both the conclusion follow the statement as both correctly explain the given statement.
The statement says that greatest need in India is not for sophisticated gadgets but for programmers but this does not mean that there is an adequate number of sophisticated gadgets. Secondly, there is a need for programmers but it cannot be concluded that emphasis is being laid on procuring sophisticated gadgets. Hence, none of the conclusion follow.
It is clear from the statement that a product of company 'X' has good quality and is also available at a reasonable price. Hence, both the conclusion follow.
Both the conclusion follow. The waiver is incorporated because some of student for MA will have previous experience and some of the students will not have previous experience of social work.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.