The use of term 'All' in the conclusion I makes it invalid. We know that, definite conclusion cannot be drawn from general statement.
Ministers arrived at the public function in their cars. Thus. ministers have cars and they attended public function. Therefore, only II and III are implicit in the statement.
It is not necessary that A is a clerk though he is poor.
James gets paid for his work.
Both I and II follows
Temple and Church are place of worship. It does not imply that hindus and christians use the same place for worship.
Therefore, neither I nor II follows.
I is an assumption that has led the speaker to show his concern in the statement. II can also not be concluded. We don't know about the benefits/losses of alternative modes.
Clearly, people have many weaknesses, smoking is one of them. But it is not true that if a person desires to give up smoking he is not able to do it. Hence , only II is true.
Of all the TV sets manufactured in India, 'Solar' brand has the largest sale' , it can be said only when volume of sales of all brands of TV sets manufactured is know. thus, Conclusion I follows. Nothing can be said about conclusion II as we don't have any information about the production of different brands of TV.
The second conclusion is an irrational inference, But first conclusion is correct as it is impossible for a country to grow and produce all that it needs.
From the statement, we can clearly say that 'A' glass of wine will cure the woman suffering from breast cancer' .
From the statement, we Clearly say that 'India' is country of people with diverse cultures, different language and different social and economic setups' .
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.