It is apparent from the statement that hot pursuit is one of the last steps. But we don't know whether it is the ultimate. Hence I does not follow. Again, ''if you are attacked'' does not necessarily imply that the country has been attacked. Hence II does not follow.
The statement does not say about the number of viewers or the ticket rates. Hence I does not follow. Losts of thousands of pounds does not imply that the shows are to be organised in the UK. It may be Jamaica, Lebanon, Egypt etc because these are the countries where pound is the currency used.
'Not withdrawing troops' implies conclusion II.
Both I and II follow because of the tone of the statement.
Recruiting officers from abroad implies. I Conclusion II can't be correlated with the statements.
I is obvious due to the initiative taken by the government. II is also true; that is why the bank is being implemented.
I may or may not be outcome of the changes made in examination papers. But II is true.
We can't correlate the people's satisfaction with the formulated strategy. But one of the given conclusions must be true.
I is only an assumption but II is true.
Since the disease is transmitted thought articles of personal use I follows. But II does not follow from the given statement .
Slump in oil price is the result of recent steps taken by country X. On the basis of the statement, However, we can't conclude that country 'X' is an oil-producing country . But either of the two conclusions must be true.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.