Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II follows
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The speech announces intent to curb growth of expenditure and alter its composition. We must not infer unstated causal claims about “taking a toll” on growth unless explicitly indicated.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
I and II both assert reasons (“take its toll,” “composition has affected growth”) that the speech does not state. Fiscal reforms can be driven by prudence, re-prioritization, or efficiency aims; without explicit causal language, neither conclusion is necessary.
Final Answer:
Neither I nor II follows.
Discussion & Comments