The speakers is assuming II; that is why he is concerned about the failure of the relationship.
The coach is assuming I, otherwise he won't stress on his men's potential. II can't be assumed : the intention of player is a different matter.
I is implicit: it does matter a lot; that is why it goes on to make winners. II does not fit here.
Either of the two is implicit. Maybe, the speaker thinks that irrespective of how much you advertise, you won't attract tax-filers. The other possibility is: why waste money when less of it can be as effective?
Both assumptions contradict the statements.
Why are these advertisements given by these organisations? Clearly, the are assuming both I and II.
if neither I nor II is implicit.
if both I and II are implicit.
if neither I nor II is implicit.
The speaker is assuming II that is why he has referred to things related to education. Assumption I has not been hinted at in the statement.
From the given statement it cannot be inferred whether transparency exists or not. Hence I is not implicit. II is a valid assumption; that is why the speaker has jotted down new guidelines for selection process.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.