I is implicit; that is why the PIOs have maintained the Indian culture even in alien settings. But II is not implicit because a comparison between the two cultures is nowhere hinted at.
Such messages are sent to get control of a problem. II is the implicit problem. I is expected to help in getting control of the problem.
I is not implicit because it implies that value-based voting still prevails, though it does not have too long a future. But the statement clearly suggests that value-based voting is absent. What about Assumption II, which talks of the potential of value-based voting? Well, the only potential the speaker has in mind is that it's a step in the positive direction. But can it undo what has been done ? we don't know.
From the statement it is clear that the speaker has no doubt about the credibility of inquiry reports. Hence I is not implicit. II has too strong a world in never.
The speaker is assuming I; that is why he has started so. In his opinion as the economy is growing well, employment rate should increase. He is not assuming about any other factor that influences employment.
The need to treat properly the elderly and the disabled stem from both the assumptions.
DTC authorities are assuming both the assumptions; that is why they have planned so.
Even able parents may be not willing to pay the increased fee. Hence I can't be assumed. Why are they demonstrating in front of Legislative Council? Clearly, they are assuming II. Hence II is implicit.
The NHRC is assuming both ; that is why this new system has been made compulsory.
I is a restatement. But II is implicit because it is on this assumption that the comparison has been made.
Why did the court intervene and direct the state's executive machinery?
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.