Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Both Statements I and II together are not sufficient.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:We must determine the direction of P with respect to Q using two spatial statements. Direction-sense DS questions test whether a unique conclusion is implied without assuming distances or collinearity.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Translate each statement to relative quadrants. With no distances, multiple placements can satisfy the constraints. We need uniqueness for a sufficient conclusion.
Step-by-Step Solution:
From I: Place Q at origin. H must be somewhere directly south of Q. P lies somewhere west of H. Hence, P is south-west of Q or at least west and south relative to Q, but the exact bearing (W, SW, SSW, etc.) depends on distances. Direction from P to Q is therefore ambiguous using I alone.From II: F is west of Q and north of P. This places P south of F, but P's position relative to Q can vary widely; P could be anywhere south of F while F remains west of Q.Combining I and II still allows multiple valid layouts. Example A: Let Q=(0,0), H=(0,-1), P=(-1,-1). Choose F=(-1,0). Example B: Q=(0,0), H=(0,-3), P=(-4,-3), F=(-4,-2). In A, Q is NE of P; in B, Q is ENE of P—different specific directions.Verification / Alternative check:Try to force a single compass word (e.g., 'north-east'). Distances remain free variables, so uniqueness fails.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Assuming equal distances or grid alignment that is not stated; reading 'west of' as a fixed offset; forcing diagonals without necessity.
Final Answer:Both Statements I and II together are not sufficient.
Discussion & Comments