In data communications, which device aggregates simultaneous transmissions from multiple input/output (I/O) devices onto a single communication line?
-
AConcentrator
-
BModifier
-
CMultiplexer
-
DFull-duplex line
-
ENone of the above
Answer
Correct Answer: Multiplexer
Explanation
Introduction: Many communication scenarios require combining several lower-rate streams for transport over a higher-capacity link. The device that performs this combination reduces cabling, increases efficiency, and lowers cost. This question asks you to identify that device from common networking terms.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Multiple I/O sources produce data that must share one line.
- The line supports higher capacity than each individual source requires.
- Terminology includes both accurate and distractor options.
Concept / Approach: A multiplexer (MUX) combines multiple input signals onto a single output channel using time-division (TDM), frequency-division (FDM), or statistical multiplexing, depending on the technology. At the far end, a demultiplexer (DEMUX) separates the streams. While the term “concentrator” is sometimes used in telephony/data networks, “multiplexer” is the canonical device that aggregates signals at the physical/link level for a single line.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify requirement: many sources onto one higher-capacity medium.Recall device: multiplexer performs TDM/FDM/statistical combination.Select the standard term: multiplexer.Verification / Alternative check: Examples include T1/E1 multiplexers (time slots), optical WDM systems (wavelength slots), and statistical multiplexers for packet streams, all reaffirming the MUX role.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- Concentrator: can refer to certain aggregation devices but is less precise than multiplexer for a single-line combination at the physical/link level.
- Modifier: not a standard communications device name.
- Full-duplex line: describes a link's capability, not an aggregating device.
- None of the above: incorrect because multiplexer is correct.
Common Pitfalls: Confusing general aggregation terms with the specific MUX/DEMUX pair; assuming full-duplex implies aggregation (it does not).
Final Answer: Multiplexer.