Engineering herbicide resistance in transgenic plants — which strategic approaches are used?

Biotechnology Transgenic Plant Difficulty: Easy
Choose an option
  • A
    Alter the herbicide target protein so it becomes insensitive to the herbicide
  • B
    Overproduce the target enzyme to overcome inhibition
  • C
    Introduce a pathway or enzyme that detoxifies the herbicide molecule
  • D
    All of the above
  • E
    None of the above

Answer

Correct Answer: All of the above

Explanation

Introduction / Context:Herbicide resistance traits can be engineered using multiple strategies, each addressing a different point in the herbicide–plant interaction: target modification, target overproduction, or metabolism-based detoxification.

Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Target enzymes include EPSPS (glyphosate) or ALS (sulfonylureas/imazapyrs).
  • Detox enzymes include PAT/Bar (glufosinate) or other degradative enzymes.
  • Overexpression sometimes buffers partial inhibition.

Concept / Approach:

All listed strategies have precedents: insensitive EPSPS mutations, ALS variants, or overexpression; and detoxification by acetyltransferases or oxygenases. Therefore, the comprehensive answer is that all can be used depending on herbicide mode of action.

Step-by-Step Solution:

List known resistance mechanisms.Match each to real-world examples.Conclude that multiple avenues are valid.Select “All of the above.”

Verification / Alternative check:

Commercial crops exhibit target-site mutations (EPSPS, ALS) and detoxification (bar/pat) strategies.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Each individual option is correct, so “None” and single-option choices are incomplete.

Common Pitfalls:

Assuming one universal method; herbicides act via distinct targets requiring tailored strategies.

Final Answer:

All of the above

Discussion & Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion