Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Both [A] and [R] are true and [R] is the correct reason for [A]
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
At sewer junctions where a smaller-diameter line discharges into a larger one, detailing the relative soffit (crown) and invert levels is essential for smooth flow. A common rule is to match the crown of the larger outgoing sewer with the crown of the smaller incoming sewer. This practice influences hydraulic grade line behavior and maintenance performance.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Matching crowns ensures that the incoming stream does not encounter an upward step at the junction. If inverts were matched instead, the larger sewer’s crown would be lower, creating a hydraulic drop and a pocket where flow from the smaller sewer could back up or pond, increasing the chance of surcharge and grit deposition. Aligning crowns provides a continuous soffit, reducing turbulence zones and improving flow transition into the larger conduit.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Standard sewer design manuals illustrate soffit alignment as a measure to prevent ponding at manholes and to maintain self-cleansing velocities, especially at low flows.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Matching inverts instead of crowns; ignoring energy losses at junctions; failing to consider drop connections when depth differences are large.
Final Answer:
Both [A] and [R] are true and [R] is the correct reason for [A]
Discussion & Comments