In this statement and conclusion question about determination and goal setting, two statements are given. You must treat them as true and decide which of the conclusions I and II logically follow. Statement I: Determination is the key to success. If a person determines to achieve a certain goal in life, no one can stop that person from achieving it. Statement II: Prioritizing various determined goals is an important aspect of decision making. Conclusion I: If a person decides to achieve three goals in the near future, energy will be divided into three parts and the person can never succeed. Conclusion II: By making a prior plan to achieve those three goals, the person can move closer to achieving all of them.

Introduction / Context:
This problem explores logical reasoning in the context of motivation, determination, and planning. Two statements describe the power of determination and the importance of prioritizing goals. You must use these statements to judge whether the given conclusions about success with multiple goals are logically supported.

Given Data / Assumptions:
- Statement I: Determination is the key to success, and if a person firmly decides to achieve a goal, no one can stop that person from achieving it.
- Statement II: Prioritizing different determined goals is an important part of decision making.
- Conclusion I: If someone aims for three goals, energy will be divided so much that success becomes impossible.
- Conclusion II: Making a prior plan for those three goals can help the person move closer to all of them.

Concept / Approach:
The first statement emphasizes that determination leads to success, not failure. The second statement emphasizes planning and prioritization. A conclusion that directly denies the possibility of success when multiple goals exist clashes with the basic spirit of Statement I. On the other hand, a conclusion that highlights the usefulness of planning for multiple goals fits naturally with Statement II.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: From Statement I, if a person is determined about a goal, that determination acts as a strong driving force towards success. Step 2: Statement I does not say that determination becomes ineffective when there is more than one goal; it only states that determination is key for success with goals in general. Step 3: Statement II explains that when there are many goals, prioritization and planning become important decision making tools. Step 4: Conclusion I states that if a person works toward three goals, energy is divided into three parts and success can never be achieved. Step 5: This directly contradicts Statement I, which says that determination can overcome obstacles and lead to success. There is no mention that multiple goals automatically make success impossible. Step 6: Therefore, Conclusion I does not follow; it is more pessimistic than the statements support. Step 7: Conclusion II says that making a prior plan for three goals can help the person move closer to all of them. This is consistent with Statement II, which stresses the importance of prioritizing and planning for determined goals. Step 8: Planning and prioritization are natural strategies to manage multiple goals, so Conclusion II is a reasonable and logical outcome of the given statements.

Verification / Alternative check:
Consider a person with three goals, each approached with strong determination. According to Statement I, determination is key to success; there is no restriction on the number of goals. Now add Statement II, which suggests prioritizing and planning. Combining both, we expect that with determination plus proper planning, the person can progress significantly on all three goals. This supports Conclusion II. However, claiming that success is impossible simply because energy is divided ignores the positive role of determination and planning described in the statements.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B says both conclusions follow, but Conclusion I clearly conflicts with the idea that determination leads to success. Option C says neither follows, which wrongly rejects Conclusion II even though it is directly supported by the emphasis on prioritizing goals. Option D chooses only Conclusion I, ignoring that this conclusion is contrary to the text. Option E suggests that Conclusion II is not logically forced, but it naturally flows from the combination of determination and planning highlighted in the statements.

Common Pitfalls:
One common error is to interpret multiple goals as inherently negative, leading to assumptions that energy gets diluted and success becomes impossible. While this may be a personal belief, the statements in the problem emphasize determination and effective planning, not failure. Always align your conclusions with the tone and content of the given statements rather than personal opinions about having many goals.

Final Answer:
The correct option is Only conclusion II follows, because effective planning and prioritization of multiple determined goals are directly supported, while an absolute claim of failure is not.