Difficulty: Hard
Correct Answer: Both statements together are sufficient, but NEITHER alone is sufficient.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:We must determine if R is C’s granddaughter (i.e., R is female and is a child of one of C’s children). The statements define relationships among A, C, R, and B. Sufficiency depends on whether we can infer R’s lineage and gender conclusively.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:To prove R is C’s granddaughter, we must show (1) R is indeed C’s grandchild and (2) R is female. Combine lineage from I with the sex-count constraint from II.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) From I alone: We know A’s only sister is mother of B and R ⇒ R and B are that sister’s children. But we do not know if A’s sister is also C’s child (we do not yet know who C is). Thus I alone does not link R to C; insufficient.2) From II alone: We know C is A’s mother and C has exactly one grandson B. We do not know who R is or through which child of C she might descend. Insufficient.3) Combine I + II: Since C is A’s mother, A’s only sister (from I) is also C’s daughter. Therefore, the children of A’s sister (namely B and R) are C’s grandchildren. From II, C has only one grandson—B. Hence any other grandchild (including R) must be female (otherwise there would be at least two grandsons). Thus R is a granddaughter of C.Verification / Alternative check:Could R be male? If R were male, C would have at least two grandsons: B and R, contradicting II. Therefore R must be female; and by lineage, R is C’s granddaughter.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Overlooking that “only one grandson” forces every other grandchild to be female; forgetting that A’s sister is also C’s child, which connects R and B to C.
Final Answer:Both statements together are sufficient, but NEITHER alone is sufficient.
Discussion & Comments