C++ default parameters and base-class constructor: what does this program print when calling CountIt with two arguments? #include<iostream.h> class BaseCounter { protected: long int count; public: void CountIt(int x, int y = 10, int z = 20) { count = 0; cout << x << " " << y << " " << z << endl; } BaseCounter() { count = 0; } BaseCounter(int x) { count = x; } }; class DerivedCounter : public BaseCounter { public: DerivedCounter() { } DerivedCounter(int x) : BaseCounter(x) { } }; int main() { DerivedCounter objDC(30); objDC.CountIt(40, 50); return 0; }
-
A30 10 20
-
BGarbage 10 20
-
C40 50 20
-
D20 40 50
-
E40 Garbage Garbage
Answer
Correct Answer: 40 50 20
Explanation
Introduction / Context: This program exercises default parameters in a member function inherited by a derived class. The call supplies two explicit arguments; the third uses the default specified in the function declaration.
Given Data / Assumptions:
DerivedCounter objDC(30)initializes the base part but does not affectCountIt’s parameter printing.- Call is
objDC.CountIt(40, 50). - Defaults for
CountItare y = 10, z = 20.
Concept / Approach: Default arguments are filled from right to left for parameters not provided at the call site. With two arguments, x = 40 and y = 50 are bound explicitly; z uses its default 20. The body assigns count = 0 and prints the three values.
Step-by-Step Solution: 1) x binds to 40. 2) y binds to 50. 3) z falls back to 20. 4) The function prints “40 50 20”.
Verification / Alternative check: Call CountIt(40) and you would see “40 10 20” because both y and z would use defaults.
Why Other Options Are Wrong: Options involving 30 confuse the stored count with parameters; “Garbage” is irrelevant because all parameters are fully specified or defaulted.
Common Pitfalls: Assuming constructor arguments propagate into unrelated function parameters.
Final Answer: 40 50 20