When pulses must be counted and displayed in decimal, which counter type is commonly chosen? Select the best match used for decimal readouts and displays.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: BCD

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Many practical applications, such as frequency counters or event counters, need to display results in base-10. Counters that naturally present their state in decimal-oriented code simplify driving seven-segment displays or decimal readouts.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The requirement is to display numeric results in base-10.
  • BCD (Binary Coded Decimal) expresses each decimal digit with four binary bits.
  • Display drivers and decoders commonly expect BCD inputs.


Concept / Approach:
Although “decade” and “BCD” are closely related (a decade counter has ten states), BCD counters explicitly output in a decimal-digit-friendly format. This makes interfacing to BCD-to-7-segment decoders straightforward, which is why BCD counters are often selected when the output is intended for decimal displays.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Identify need: base-10 display → prefer BCD-coded outputs.Match device: BCD counters output 0000–1001 for digits 0–9.Simplify hardware: BCD-to-7-segment decoder directly converts to display segments.Therefore, BCD counters are commonly used.


Verification / Alternative check:

Review common parts (e.g., 74xx90/74xx192 families) and application notes; BCD outputs are standard for decimal displays.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Synchronous: Describes timing architecture, not base-10 suitability.Bean: Not a recognized counter type.Decade: Close, but “BCD” better specifies the display-oriented code format expected by decoders.


Common Pitfalls:

Confusing “decade” (modulus-10) with the code format needed for displays; BCD conveys that format explicitly.


Final Answer:

BCD

More Questions from Counters

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion