Counter terminology — modulus vs maximum count value: For a digital counter, the modulus (mod-N) equals the number of unique states it cycles through (N). Is it correct to say the modulus is the same as the counter’s maximum count capacity N (with states 0 to N-1)?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Correct

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Students frequently mix up two related ideas: the modulus N (the number of distinct states) and the highest numeric code reached (which is N-1 for a simple up-counter starting at 0). Clarifying this relationship helps when designing divide-by-N frequency counters and decoding logic for terminal counts.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • A mod-N counter cycles through N distinct states.
  • For a natural binary up-counter, states typically enumerate 0, 1, …, N-1.
  • On reaching N-1, the next clock wraps back to 0, completing the cycle.


Concept / Approach:
By definition, the modulus equals the period in states before the sequence repeats. Therefore a mod-10 counter repeats every 10 states (0 through 9). While the maximum numeric code observed is N-1, the counter’s “maximum count capacity” in terms of how many unique states it will visit per cycle is indeed N, which is its modulus. This definition is technology-independent and applies to synchronous and asynchronous counters alike.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Define modulus: number of unique states in one complete counting cycle.Example: mod-8 → states 0..7 → eight unique states.Maximum numeric code value = N-1 for up-counters starting at 0.Hence modulus N equals the counter’s capacity in unique states.


Verification / Alternative check:
Frequency division verifies the same: a mod-N counter divides the input clock by N (one output cycle per N input clocks), matching the definition that N is the number of states per cycle.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Incorrect: Confuses maximum numeric code (N-1) with the count of states (N).
  • True only for synchronous counters: Applies equally to ripple and synchronous counters.
  • Valid only when counting down: Direction does not change modulus.
  • Depends on unused states being masked: Unused states are a design detail; modulus still counts the recurring legal states.


Common Pitfalls:
Equating the largest displayed number with modulus; forgetting that 0 is a valid state; assuming modulus depends on implementation type rather than the state machine cycle length.


Final Answer:
Correct

More Questions from Sequential Logic Circuits

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion