Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Both (a) and (b)
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Tryptophan biosynthesis branches from the shikimate pathway. Regulation typically occurs at the entry to the aromatic pathway and at the first committed step toward tryptophan. The organism Corynebacterium glutamicum is a major industrial microbe; understanding its control points is key for amino acid overproduction strategies.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Control of tryptophan biosynthesis is distributed: DAHP synthetase balances overall aromatic flux and is feedback-controlled by end products; anthranilate synthase is often specifically inhibited by tryptophan. Engineering for higher tryptophan titers therefore targets both enzymes: desensitizing feedback at DAHP synthetase to increase total aromatic flow and relieving inhibition at anthranilate synthase to channel more chorismate to tryptophan.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Identify the entry-point enzyme (DAHP synthetase) controlling total aromatic carbon flow.Identify the branch-point enzyme (anthranilate synthase) committing to tryptophan.Note feedback inhibition patterns relevant to C. glutamicum.Conclude that regulation operates at both steps.
Verification / Alternative check:
Metabolic engineering literature repeatedly reports improved tryptophan titers by mutating/desensitizing both DAHP synthetase and anthranilate synthase in Corynebacterium spp.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
DAHP synthetase only: misses the specific branch control by anthranilate synthase.Anthranilate synthase only: ignores upstream flux limitation at DAHP formation.Phosphoenolpyruvate: a metabolite, not the regulatory enzyme per se.
Common Pitfalls:
Tuning only one node and neglecting the upstream carbon supply into the aromatic pathway.
Final Answer:
Both (a) and (b)
Discussion & Comments