Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: sulsul
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:This analogy uses an alternating Caesar shift, switching direction on each successive letter. Recognizing alternating operations is essential in decoding many exam-style letter coding problems.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:Verify the alternating pattern on the first mapping, then invert the process to recover the preimage for pxivro. Use A=1 … Z=26 and modular wrap-around.
Step-by-Step Solution:
C→z (−3), o→r (+3), r→o (−3), d→g (+3), e→b (−3), n→q (+3). Pattern confirmed.To get pxivro, invert letter-by-letter: positions 1,3,5 were “−3,” so original = encoded +3; positions 2,4,6 were “+3,” so original = encoded −3.1: p→s, 2: x→u, 3: i→l, 4: v→s, 5: r→u, 6: o→l.Thus the original word is sulsul.Verification / Alternative check:Apply the forward alternating rule to “sulsul”: s→p (−3), u→x (+3), l→i (−3), s→v (+3), u→r (−3), l→o (+3). This reproduces pxivro exactly.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:Applying a constant shift to all letters, or reversing the alternation mid-word. Keep careful track of positions and signs.
Final Answer:sulsul
Discussion & Comments