During the conversion phase of the systems development life cycle (SDLC), which statement is NOT correct and should therefore be avoided?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Documentation should be ignored during conversion to save time.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
The conversion phase transitions the organization from the legacy system to the new solution. Success requires disciplined planning, stakeholder coordination, and complete documentation to ensure operational continuity.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • There is a legacy system and a target system.
  • Cutover may be big-bang, phased, or parallel.
  • We must identify the one statement that is not correct.


Concept / Approach:
Good practice emphasizes documentation of configurations, data migration steps, fallback plans, and run-books. Skipping documentation increases risk and impedes support after go-live.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Confirm collaborative planning with users and IT (correct).Acknowledge safe decommission strategies like parallel or pilots (correct).Identify the harmful claim to ignore documentation (incorrect and risky).Include training, procedures, and support readiness (correct).Plan and test migration and validation steps (correct).


Verification / Alternative check:
Post-implementation reviews consistently cite missing documentation as a root cause of instability and extended outages.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:
They reflect standard, recommended conversion practices that reduce risk and improve success rates.



Common Pitfalls:
Underestimating data cleansing and reconciliation; failing to document operational handoff; inadequate rollback planning.



Final Answer:
Documentation should be ignored during conversion to save time.

More Questions from System Analysis and Design

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion