Language paradigms: can C++ be used both as a procedural (structured) programming language and as an object-oriented language, depending on how you design your code?

Introduction / Context:
C++ is a multi-paradigm language. It supports procedural, object-oriented, generic, and even functional programming styles. Teams often adopt different subsets of the language to match project needs, from small utilities to large frameworks with rich type hierarchies.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• C++ includes C-like constructs (functions, structs, pointers) and OO constructs (classes, inheritance, virtual functions).
• Templates and the Standard Template Library further enable generic programming.
• We assume standard-conforming C++ compilers.

Concept / Approach:
As a superset of C's core model with added features, C++ permits writing purely procedural programs using functions and simple data structures, or fully object-oriented designs using classes, encapsulation, and polymorphism. Many real-world codebases mix paradigms, choosing the right tool for each module.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Write a procedural module using free functions and plain structs.Create an OO module with classes and virtual methods for extensibility.Link both modules; the language and toolchain support the coexistence effortlessly.Therefore, the statement is true: C++ can be used procedurally and object-oriented.

Verification / Alternative check:
Standard libraries themselves demonstrate multiple paradigms: algorithms are generic (templates), containers are object-oriented types, and many utilities are simple procedural functions.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• False / Depends on the compiler: Paradigm support is defined by the language, not a specific compiler.

Common Pitfalls:
Dogmatically restricting code to a single paradigm can reduce clarity. Use the paradigm that best fits the problem while maintaining consistency and readability.

Final Answer:
True.