According to many landowners, what are common complaints they have about irresponsible hunters?

Introduction / Context:
This question fits under general knowledge and outdoor ethics, often included in hunter education or environmental awareness sections. Hunting on private land usually requires a good relationship between hunters and landowners. When hunters behave irresponsibly, landowners develop complaints that can lead to restrictions on hunting access. The question asks which complaints are commonly mentioned by landowners about such irresponsible hunters.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The context is hunting activities on or near privately owned land.
• The listed complaints include lack of written permission, excessive noise, and leaving litter.
• The final option, All of the above, suggests that more than one of these behaviours may occur together.
• We assume general hunter safety guidelines that emphasise respect for property owners.

Concept / Approach:
Responsible hunting involves more than simply following wildlife laws. It also requires courtesy, safety, and respect for landowners rights. Hunter education materials often highlight that landowners complain about hunters who enter without proper permission, who disturb livestock or families with unnecessary noise, and who leave trash, shells, or other waste behind. These behaviours damage trust, so many courses stress that all of them must be avoided. Therefore the combined answer All of the above best reflects the set of complaints that landowners commonly express.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Consider the importance of obtaining written permission before hunting on private property. Failing to do so is often illegal and certainly disrespectful. Step 2: Think about noise. Shooting always involves sound, but shouting, careless vehicle use, and repeated disturbance can annoy landowners and scare livestock. Step 3: Littering is another serious issue, since plastic, cartridges, food wrappers, and other waste can harm animals, damage fields, and create an untidy environment. Step 4: Recognise that all three listed behaviours are negative and are indeed mentioned together in hunter safety guidelines as things to avoid. Step 5: Therefore the most accurate option is All of the above, since landowners often complain about all these behaviours, not just one of them.

Verification / Alternative check:
To verify, you can think of typical advice given in responsible hunting checklists. They usually say to ask permission in advance, preferably in writing, to keep gates the way you found them, to avoid driving across fields, to minimise unnecessary noise, and to carry out all trash. These points correspond directly to the complaints listed in the options. If any one of these behaviours is common enough to be mentioned in safety courses, it is reasonable that landowners complain about the full set when dealing with irresponsible visitors.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A alone covers only the permission issue and ignores noise and litter. Option B focuses only on noise, which is important but not the only problem. Option C singles out littering, which is serious, but landowners also sympathise with neighbours and animals disturbed by unauthorised access and noise. Because all three behaviours are objectionable and commonly cited together, they are better combined in option D than treated as isolated complaints.

Common Pitfalls:
Some learners may think examiners rarely use All of the above, so they avoid it automatically. Others may feel that one issue, such as litter, is more serious and forget that repeated small annoyances, like unannounced entry or loud behaviour, also matter. The safe approach is to consider whether each listed behaviour is truly a problem; if every one is clearly unacceptable, then All of the above is likely to be correct.

Final Answer:
Landowners often complain that irresponsible hunters show all of these behaviours, so the correct answer is All of the above.