Coaxial line versus two-wire open line — characteristic impedance and wave velocity In typical RF practice, how do a coaxial line and a two-wire open line compare?
-
Athe characteristic impedance is less than that of two wire line
-
Bthe wave velocity is less than that of two wire line
-
Cboth (a) and (b)
-
Dneither (a) nor (b)
Answer
Correct Answer: both (a) and (b)
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Coaxial cables and two-wire open lines (ladder line) are common RF transmission media. Their characteristic impedance Z0 and phase velocity v_p follow from geometry and dielectric properties. Comparing them helps guide cable selection for matching and loss considerations.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Typical two-wire open line in air (ε_r ≈ 1) with high Z0 (often hundreds of ohms).
- Typical coax uses a solid or foamed dielectric (ε_r > 1) and has Z0 around 50–75 Ω.
- Equal port impedances assumed for comparison.
Concept / Approach:Characteristic impedance: two-wire lines in air generally exhibit higher Z0 than common coaxes → Z0(coax) is less. Wave velocity: v_p = c / sqrt(ε_eff). For an air-line, ε_eff ≈ 1 → v_p ≈ c. For dielectric-filled coax, ε_eff ≈ ε_r > 1 → v_p < c. Therefore, both statements (a) and (b) are usually true in practical builds.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Compare Z0: ladder line (≈ 300 Ω) vs coax (≈ 50–75 Ω) → Z0(coax) lower.Compare v_p: two-wire in air ≈ c; coax velocity factor typically 0.66–0.85 → lower than two-wire.Conclude: both (a) and (b) are correct.Verification / Alternative check:Vendor datasheets list velocity factor and Z0 values consistent with these trends for common products (RG-58, RG-59, ladder line, etc.).
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- A or B alone omits the other true statement.
- D contradicts widely observed practice for typical materials and geometries.
Common Pitfalls:Assuming air-spaced coax (higher v_p) or dielectric-loaded two-wire; while exceptions exist, the general comparison stands.
Final Answer:both (a) and (b)